How can federal government help Ontario retirees?
|
Bookmark and Share
Apr 24, 2014  |  Vote 0    0

How can federal government help Ontario retirees?

All Work and No Play: Ontario’s Retirement Crisis — A Metroland Special Series

SIDEBAR

The Ontario government has embarked on a Seniors Strategy informed by a 198-page report, Living Longer, Living Well, by Dr. Samir Sinha, director of geriatrics at Mount Sinai and University Health Network hospitals.

Sinha presented the report in December 2012 to Health Minister Deb Matthews and then-minister for seniors Linda Jeffrey.

Its key recommendations include:

• Need for government to further enhance the development and availability of non-profit, safe, dignified transportation systems for older Ontarians;

• Promote healthy aging and active living and better communicate about services available in communities;

• Maintain current and future commitments to financially support low- and moderate-income older Ontarians;

• Ensure all Ontarians who want a primary doctor have one;

• Improve funding for house calls;

• Develop an income-based system for home care;

• Encourage development of more Assisted Living and Supportive Housing as alternative to Long-Term Care Homes;

• Long-term care (LTC): Increase short-term and convalescent care; enable LTC homes to provide higher levels of care to people with complex care needs; explore ability of LTC homes to serve as community hubs to provide services, including home care;

• Ministry of Health continue its work of reforming the Ontario Drug Benefit to more directly link benefits to income rather than age and consider expanding care for all Ontarians

Mississauga News

ONTARIO — Ontarians spend approximately $1,700 a month for a basic room in a long-term care (LTC) home. An Ontario retirement home residence room costs nearly double that monthly.

How could the federal government help Baby Boomers and Generation X financially plan?

The Institute for Research on Public Policy released a report in 2012 that concluded that an universal public insurance financing scheme is the best option, compared with private savings and private insurance.

The report highlights two ways the government can help. One is to create a medical savings account, similar to an RRSP with tax exemptions specifically to cover future LTC services. The other option is a reverse mortgage, which report authors suggest may not be the best option for Canada since few seniors have houses sufficient in value to cover the cost of formal care services they will need.

CARP has long advocated for “aging at home,” which it said includes a better long-term strategy that takes into consideration the whole person, including their financial needs.

CARP cites Germany as a “good test case” for alternate ways of funding and providing LTC. Germany’s population is older than Canada’s: more than 20 per cent are 65 or older; five per cent are older than 80.

Germany, like Japan, Korea, the Netherlands and Luxembourg, provides universal coverage for LTC, which operates much like the Canada Pension.

Participation is mandatory. Individuals and employers pay equal contributions. Unemployment insurance covers contributions for the unemployed.

Since 2008, total contributions for the first 44,550 Euros of annual income are 1.95 per cent, split equally between employer and employee.

Since LTC insurance is meant to provide a baseline of care, German citizens are free to purchase supplementary private LTC coverage, which more than 1.58 million Germans did as of 2009.

Every month, recipients choose between cash, intended for people who require lighter care or home care services, and in-kind benefits intended for people who require more intense care in nursing homes.

|
Bookmark and Share

(0) Comment

Join The Conversation Sign Up Login

Latest Local News

PHOTOS AND VIDEOS

In Your Neighbourhood Today

SPONSORED CONTENT View More